Do Army Attack Aviation or AC-130 engagements require terminal attack control?

Army Attack Aviation and AC-130 engagements do not require terminal attack control in the same manner as close air support missions. Terminal attack control is primarily used for overseeing and directing airstrikes in proximity to friendly forces, which involves specific responsibilities and procedures to ensure safety and effectiveness.

In the case of Army Attack Aviation, these units typically have a direct command structure that allows them to operate independently. They are capable of making real-time decisions based on their situational awareness and the tactical environment. Their operations are often integrated into the ground unit's command framework, negating the need for terminal attack control.

Similarly, AC-130s, which are typically used for precision fire support, can execute missions based on the directives given to them without necessarily requiring the oversight of a terminal attack controller. The nature of their engagement allows them to apply firepower effectively without the same level of coordination necessary for close air support missions requiring terminal attack control.

In summary, the answer reflects the autonomous capabilities of these platforms and their operational integration within the broader military framework, which does not necessitate the constraints that terminal attack control would impose in other contexts.