JTACs/FAC(A)s should respond to readbacks of a CAS brief with which of the following?

When responding to readbacks of a Close Air Support (CAS) brief, it is essential for JTACs (Joint Terminal Attack Controllers) and FAC(A)s (Forward Air Controllers – Airborne) to confirm that the information has been accurately received and understood. The appropriate response, "Readback correct or good readback," indicates that the communication was clear and that the receiving party accurately captured the critical elements of the CAS brief.

This confirmation is crucial because it ensures that all parties are on the same page regarding the mission details, which can include target information, restrictions, and other vital aspects necessary for effective and safe operation. An accurate readback helps prevent misunderstandings that could lead to operational errors or safety risks during the execution of air support.

Other options suggest different responses that may not convey the same level of certainty about the accuracy of the readback. For instance, indicating that clarification is needed may imply that there was a misunderstanding, while standing by for confirmation could delay the operation without providing assurance. Therefore, affirming that the readback is correct is the best practice to promote operational effectiveness and safety.