Which option is NOT considered a method for responsive fires?

The correct answer highlights the fact that streamlining the Call for Fire by shortening the number of transmissions is not inherently considered a method for achieving responsive fires. Responsive fires emphasize timely and effective coordination and execution of fire support in battle scenarios.

While shortening transmissions can expedite the process of calling for fire, it does not inherently enhance the overall responsiveness of the fire support system. Responsive fires rely on well-trained personnel, rehearsed procedures, and pre-planned fire support requirements to ensure that the right assets are available and can be deployed quickly when needed.

Rehearsals are crucial as they prepare all involved personnel to execute their roles efficiently in real situations. Planning fire support requirements in advance ensures that resources are allocated appropriately and can be quickly accessed when situations unfold. Continually training observers ensures that personnel are always ready and capable of conducting effective fire calls, making them better prepared to react promptly during engagements.

Thus, while shortening transmissions may contribute to the efficiency of communication, it does not encompass the broader essential aspects considered in the development of genuinely responsive fire support operations.